e it will rearm itself to do some more wrong things going forward. So, I think it's better to wait for the handler to return in case it's already been queued up for execution. Also, it should be prevented from rearming itself in that case. Second, in radeon_set_pm_method() the cancel_delayed_work() is not sufficient to prevent the work handler from running and queing up itself for the next run (the failure scenario is that cancel_delayed_work() returns 0, so the handler is run, it waits on the mutex and then rearms itself after the mutex has been released), so again the work handler should be prevented from rearming itself in that case.. Finally, there's a potential deadlock in radeon_pm_fini(), because cancel_delayed_work_sync() is called under rdev->pm.mutex, but the work handler tries to acquire the same mutex (if it wins the race). Fix the issues described above. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie @2x