upply+0x7cc/0xbe0 regulator_register_resolve_supply+0x28/0xb8 as the regulator_list_mutex must be held when calling _regulator_put(). To solve this, simply switch to using regulator_put(). While at it, we should also make sure that no concurrent access happens to our rdev while we clear out the supply pointer. Add appropriate locking to ensure that. While the code in question will be removed altogether in a follow-up commit, I believe it is still beneficial to have this corrected before removal for future reference. Fixes: 36a1f1b6ddc6 ("regulator: core: Fix memory leak in regulator_resolve_supply()") Fixes: 8e5356a73604 ("regulator: core: Clear the supply pointer if enabling fails") Signed-off-by: André Draszik Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260109-regulators-defer-v2-2-1a25dc968e60@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index 4b6182cde859a..b2dcd1acd0ece 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -2285,8 +2285,16 @@ static int regulator_resolve_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev) if (rdev->use_count) { ret = regulator_enable(rdev->supply); if (ret < 0) { - _regulator_put(rdev->supply); + struct regulator *supply; + + regulator_lock_two(rdev, rdev->supply->rdev, &ww_ctx); + + supply = rdev->supply; rdev->supply = NULL; + + regulator_unlock_two(rdev, supply->rdev, &ww_ctx); + + regulator_put(supply); goto out; } } -- 2.51.0[PATCH 6.19 254/781] regulator: core: fix locking in regulator_resolve_supply() error pathGreg Kroah-Hartman undefinedstable@vger.kernel.org undefined undefined undefined undefined undefinedÄ>†™