invoke call_rcu(), the callback function is eventually going to be diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/local_ops.rst b/Documentation/core-api/local_ops.rst index a84f8b0c7ab2..0b42ceaaf3c4 100644 --- a/Documentation/core-api/local_ops.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/local_ops.rst @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ Here is a sample module which implements a basic per cpu counter using static void __exit test_exit(void) { - timer_delete_sync(&test_timer); + timer_shutdown_sync(&test_timer); } module_init(test_init); diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst index c447d55fa080..3bbb11ba647a 100644 --- a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst +++ b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst @@ -1007,6 +1007,11 @@ calling add_timer() at the end of their timer function). Because this is a fairly common case which is prone to races, you should use timer_delete_sync() (``include/linux/timer.h``) to +Before freeing a timer, timer_shutdown() or timer_shutdown_sync() should be +called which will keep it from being rearmed. Any subsequent attempt to +rearm the timer will be silently ignored by the core code. + + Locking Speed ============= diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/core-api/local_ops.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/core-api/local_ops.rst index 22493b9b829c..eb5423f60f17 100644 --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/core-api/local_ops.rst +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/core-api/local_ops.rst @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ UP之间没有不同的行为，在你的架构的 ``local.h`` 中包括 ``asm-g static void __exit test_exit(void) { - timer_delete_sync(&test_timer); + timer_shutdown_sync(&test_timer); } module_init(test_init); --[PATCH 6.1.y 11/12] timers: Update the documentation to reflect on the new timer_shutdown() APIJeongjun Park undefinedstable@vger.kernel.org undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined?y