er, if the last extent in a block group is removed, the last extent position will be smaller than the other real write pointer position. Then, that will cause an error due to mismatch of the write pointers. We can fixup this case by moving the alloc_offset to the corresponding write pointer position. Fixes: c0d90a79e8e6 ("btrfs: zoned: fix alloc_offset calculation for partly conventional block groups") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.16+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c index f27ba6e9b47d5..6c06581954181 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c @@ -1449,6 +1449,20 @@ static int btrfs_load_block_group_dup(struct btrfs_block_group *bg, return -EIO; } + /* + * When the last extent is removed, last_alloc can be smaller than the other write + * pointer. In that case, last_alloc should be moved to the corresponding write + * pointer position. + */ + for (int i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) { + if (zone_info[i].alloc_offset == WP_CONVENTIONAL) + continue; + if (last_alloc <= zone_info[i].alloc_offset) { + last_alloc = zone_info[i].alloc_offset; + break; + } + } + if (zone_info[0].alloc_offset == WP_CONVENTIONAL) zone_info[0].alloc_offset = last_alloc; -- 2.51.0[PATCH 6.19 731/844] btrfs: zoned: fixup last alloc pointer after extent removal for DUPSasha Levin undefinedlinux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org undefined undefined undefined undefined undefinedeT