Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted Colors in HTML -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH DKIMwl.org - High trust sender SpamTally: Final spam score: -19 ----==_mimepart_697cd37fa679c_c71118730fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable linsun left a comment (cncf/toc#1903) Hi @joshhalley and team, I reviewed the google doc link (assuming it is s= ame as the github PR), I think it LGTM mostly. I noted a few things I'd l= ike to see it corrected/updated: MELT - please spell it out MCP from Anthropic =E2=80=94 can we clarify it is in AAIF now? The Agntcy identity framework - do we need to mention it? I feel it does= n=E2=80=99t have momentum like MCP or A2A yet. MCP Project: https://www.anthropic.com/news/model-context-protocol - can = we replace with a vendor neutral link, modelcontextprotocol.io? https://github.com/plurai-ai/intellagent why would it be mentioned? I=E2=80= =99d prefer not mentioning it as it is not in a foundation. And it doesn=E2= =80=99t look very popular either. https://docs.nvidia.com/datacenter/cloud-native/gpu-operator/latest/gpu-o= perator-confidential-containers.html - CoCo is a cncf project, can we rep= lace this with a vendor neutral link? -- = Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/1903#issuecomment-3824413536 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: = ----==_mimepart_697cd37fa679c_c71118730fa Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
linsun le= ft a comment (cncf/toc#1903)

Hi @joshhalley and team, I reviewe= d the google doc link (assuming it is same as the github PR), I think it = LGTM mostly. I noted a few things I'd like to see it corrected/updated:

MELT - please spell it out
MCP from Anthropic =E2=80=94 can we clarify it is in AAIF now?

The Agntcy identity framework - do we need to mention it?= I feel it doesn=E2=80=99t have momentum like MCP or A2A yet.

MCP Project: https://www.anthropic.com/news/mod= el-context-protocol - can we replace with a vendor neutral link, mode= lcontextprotocol.io?

http= s://github.com/plurai-ai/intellagent why would it be mentioned? I=E2=80= =99d prefer not mentioning it as it is not in a foundation. And it doesn=E2= =80=99t look very popular either.

https://docs.nvidia.com/datacenter/cloud-native/gpu-operator/lat= est/gpu-operator-confidential-containers.html - CoCo is a cncf projec= t, can we replace this with a vendor neutral link?

&m= dash;
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because yo= u are subscribed to this thread.3D""Message ID: <cncf/toc/pull/1903/c3824413536@github.com>

----==_mimepart_697cd37fa679c_c71118730fa-- From - Sat Jan 31 08:51:00 2026 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hi@josie.lol Received: from witcher.mxrouting.net by witcher.mxrouting.net with LMTP id 6FIfCrR0fWkhRD0AYBR5ng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2026 03:19:16 +0000 Return-path: Envelope-to: github@josie.lol Delivery-date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 03:19:16 +0000 Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com ([192.30.252.206]) by witcher.mxrouting.net with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1vm1W0-0000000HSkB-04HU for github@josie.lol; Sat, 31 Jan 2026 03:19:16 +0000 Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-85cd016.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.144.35]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 871202036B for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2026 19:19:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2023; t=1769829555; bh=GYnN+Tbu8DGY/A3ziz6by4aKg+CHfAHyQaB4ivh5WK0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post: From; b=HCtNzFRFoLdY+Zxv4CkkxjT4nypw6LvyiJSD6e0qgMxyOvYJgSmeibhkCYSL4gIbV 5cO4gk+WsZJK4tNgty3EKQwqc15DE99sV2Aa8dz9b1zThLfXsL7B8JflT/lwBUpCyp UyvpR2M4JFs+uan1A9iQ5RO7srpCrzIG3sjbGxbM= Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 19:19:15 -0800 From: joshhalley Reply-To: cncf/toc To: cncf/toc Cc: Push Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [cncf/toc] Submission of 1749_Cloud-Native_Standards_Checklist.md (PR #1903) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_697d74b384efb_e91118435072"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list X-GitHub-Sender: joshhalley X-GitHub-Recipient: pfeifferj X-GitHub-Reason: push List-ID: cncf/toc List-Archive: https://github.com/cncf/toc List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Unsubscribe=One-Click X-GitHub-Notify-Platform: newsies X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All destinations: gi