Greg Kroah-Hartman' , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, 'Daniel Lezcano' References: <3b0720d2-9b72-48d0-998a-1fd091cec44f@arm.com> <5d4b624c-f993-49aa-95ab-5f279f7f6599@oracle.com> <8fd5a9d4-e555-4db1-aa02-8fe5b8a2962c@arm.com> <3395ad0b-425e-40f5-844c-627cff471353@oracle.com> <3f0cfac2-b753-413c-9a7e-0892c23cdbf4@arm.com> <005401dc9638$b3e2ea40$1ba8bec0$@telus.net> <29b3287e-0a08-4648-9e54-32889c99b1e3@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Christian Loehle In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "witcher.mxrouting.net", has performed the tests listed below against this email. Information: https://mxroutedocs.com/directadmin/spamfilters/ --- Content analysis details: (0.5 points) --- pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ----------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block for more information. [172.232.135.74 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.5 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager SpamTally: Final spam score: 5 On 2/10/26 08:02, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (26/02/05 07:15), Christian Loehle wrote: > [..] >> @Doug given this is on Chromebooks base=84.5 and revert=59.5 doesn't necessarily mean >> 29.6% decrease in system performance in a traditional throughput sense. >> The "benchmark" might me measuring dropped frames, user input latency or what have you. >> Nonetheless @Sergey do feel free to expand. > > I'm not on the performance team and I don't define those metrics, so > I can't really comment. But frame drops during Google Docs scrolling, > for instance, or typing is a user visible regression, that people tend > to notice. Yeah I guess that was my point already, i.e. it isn't implausible that e.g. a frequency reduction from 2.2GHz to 2.0GHz (-10%) might result in double the number of dropped frames (= score reduction of 50%). Everything just an example but don't be thrown off by the 29.6% reduction in score and expect to go looking for -29.6% cpu frequency (like you would expect for many purely cpubound benchmarks). From - Tue Feb 10 09:01:17 2026 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hi@josie.lol Received: from witcher.mxrouting.net by witcher.mxrouting.net with LMTP id eHe0LtjzimlqnToAYBR5ng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 09:01:12 +0000 Return-path: Envelope-to: hi@josie.lol Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 09:01:12 +0000 Received: from sin.lore.kernel.org ([104.64.211.4]) by witcher.mxrouting.net with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1vpjcL-0000000G9gL-0bqT for hi@josie.lol; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 09:01:12 +0000 Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (conduit.subspace.kernel.org [100.90.174.1]) by sin.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46D9300BC6C