ch-general-bounces@lists.archlinux.org>); Tue, 10 Feb 2026 13:31:08 +0000 Return-path: Envelope-to: pfeifferj@archlinux.ch Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 13:31:08 +0000 Received: from lists.archlinux.org ([95.217.236.249]) by witcher.mxrouting.net with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1vpnpc-00000006t77-0kiL for pfeifferj@archlinux.ch; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 13:31:08 +0000 Received: from [95.217.236.249] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.archlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38EE62E0501; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 13:31:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s1.sapience.com (s1.sapience.com [72.84.236.66]) by lists.archlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9340562E03D1 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 13:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.archlinux.org; dkim=pass header.d=sapience.com header.s=dk-ed25519-220413 header.b=kgV5i4af; dkim=pass header.d=sapience.com header.s=dk-rsa-220413 header.b=fCLDdv21; spf=pass (lists.archlinux.org: domain of lists@sapience.com designates 72.84.236.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lists@sapience.com; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=sapience.com; arc=pass ("sapience.com:s=arc6-rsa-220412:i=1") Received: from smtp.sapience.com (srv8.prv.sapience.com [10.164.28.13]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by s1.sapience.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDD5D480A73; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 08:30:32 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sapience.com; i=@sapience.com; q=dns/txt; s=dk-ed25519-220413; t=1770730232; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : from; bh=JSeCfdFYtd2+kwT8M3b9Rlvr5KPOQNq5a35a6EiQKCA=; b=kgV5i4aflYilPsf98tgFinqxWiXk4X0LyEFDTF65dpKfobxP6o6M43pLBqL8nLWnlrGVU rOO0nsyefnYm7+UBQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sapience.com; s=arc6-rsa-220412; t=1770730232; cv=none; b=WORuqQC4aPlQ7FMA/7eW7HQ86XFRcCedqjYPA8VrVVi9wLmbltqz1XJ8sogiorJNuEUkrorWWvVXB9TvhYJkiXgNTY9xV0lep59148Wf+wTD+BQE9OHgMRykbKLLiXZDbSlUJlU+6Cpf2Pti8BlW0lvV7LVM5L0GJ2GB7oJ/rukyB1OWdh1Jpi8QCBXQDGgiaPzTs/UzTUMF9UH3KMwUl62Rf0DAuVNDRv20Nmhx2lVJcDmSXfZYxLUjEckehZuElno+pXIu2XiaVnxZnvbxvXPIJTovR/uVSEnDqdrMEKPUjw0KfrOSkdRedYzewz4fnQDaJ0AKsPZFxYdcqLhrig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sapience.com; s=arc6-rsa-220412; t=1770730232; c=relaxed/simple; bh=28omcPpKitqQTJ4C7yNn5s0ER3JpX45qbAsvH22rVaM=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date: In-Reply-To:References:Autocrypt:Content-Type:User-Agent: MIME-Version; b=ivlzcvP0r/W1O4gUW7glHIGK6+YgbUNKezaNjCVnAU8zJdCV28ovvF0NPNdnaBmF9tYW7Jg7Az+VmZMMBIGRX/CugF2h1uSQiZBidBzxBdA/SCIW0nyVlOIATyI8KIEFW7oGpRlA26zXjdtrDV0tbNaVz8zLDFfAOIBl/OW3dDYcrGXG52kmJixqWzlEdHDbt9lfWZTXZffo76t4ldCJjPW/q/DQVAgvWVqk9NKMIrtlRqXvOWHbQbOWrM+Fk3ATTFix3ijGIh88feTInCp0eNp1RjltWqxxmJ6D7DMAEtphFbudm7CJse161jRmag/VmqUfc3pYTYbzVF4kQoj0hg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; arc-srv8.sapience.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sapience.com; i=@sapience.com; q=dns/txt; s=dk-rsa-220413; t=1770730232; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : from; bh=JSeCfdFYtd2+kwT8M3b9Rlvr5KPOQNq5a35a6EiQKCA=; b=fCLDdv214U3NVqdu8L8pC2NFLlmO0auF5DN5IJdpCyDLZAnwIONrClc0lEIWtcdI8eV3q 3vditNk6w1BNC7voaZImoxDNNK3UeoxJ8ROOsyoJn6LKiHcKsrtBCAoKFIVslf4rasIl5F1 3gfSNcurLKwon4U3JsNa3LyEzfBY4oXVN08O6a26aPo61DB2BfcdhXf9b8hr/C3tjJ8OpNc 8Dc3HllbVZfuacUC3frh4cgipm0KvNRRq5Nhk/EFzWuiruNwTamhxFstd9w33jaa5Grzcmd ZX8WqHdqwuCAe0E+NUngrPGOdA4t3oWQN0bw/koMAD7HGV6dGCq6Ax+eF0gw== Received: by smtp.sapience.com (Postfix) id C2AB8280016; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 08:30:32 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: glibc 2.43 in testing - moving to stable repos affected From: Genes Lists To: General Discussion about Arch Linux Cc: freswa@archlinux.org Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 08:30:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: Autocrypt: addr=lists@sapience.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=mDMEXSY9GRYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAwzFfmp+m0ldl2vgmbtPC/XN7/k5vscpADq3BmRy5R 7y0LU1haWwgTGlzdHMgKEwwIDIwMTkwNzEwKSA8bGlzdHNAc2FwaWVuY2UuY29tPoiWBBMWCAA+Ah sBBQsJCAcCBhUKCQgLAgQWAgMBAh4BAheAFiEE5YMoUxcbEgQOvOMKc+dlCv6PxQAFAmPJfooFCRl vRHEACgkQc+dlCv6PxQAc/wEA/Dbmg91DOGXll0OW1GKaZQGQDl7fHibMOKRGC6X/emoA+wQR5FIz BnV/PrXbao8LS/h0tSkeXgPsYxrzvfZInIAC Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha384"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vOHGQ1qDCUVyEkyE2SNO" User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.10 / 15.00]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[sapience.com:s=arc6-rsa-220412:i=1]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[sapience.com,reject]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[sapience.com:s=dk-ed25519-220413,sapience.com:s=dk-rsa-220413]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:72.84.236.64/28]; ASN(0.00)[asn:701, ipnet:72.84.192.0/18, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[sapience.com:+] X-Rspamd-Server: lists.archlinux.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9340562E03D1 Message-ID-Hash: CXDG2ORQIA273J2O6IQO67IWWV3TQ6BM X-Message-ID-Hash: CXDG2ORQIA273J2O6IQO67IWWV3TQ6BM X-MailFrom: lists@sapience.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: General Discussion about Arch Linux Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-DKIM: signer='sapience.com' status='pass' reason='' DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, 0 Spam score X-DKIM: signer='@sapience.com' status='pass' reason='' X-Spam-Score: -99.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "witcher.mxrouting.net", has performed the tests listed below against this email. Information: https://mxroutedocs.com/directadmin/spamfilters/ --- Content analysis details: (-99.6 points) --- pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ----------------------------------------- -0.0 USER_IN_WELCOMELIST User is listed in 'welcomelist_from' -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST DEPRECATED: See USER_IN_WELCOMELIST 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: sapience.com] 1.5 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block for more information. [95.217.236.249 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager SpamTally: Final spam score: -995 --=-vOHGQ1qDCUVyEkyE2SNO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2026-02-10 at 11:45 +0100, Frederik Schwan wrote: > I've pushed glibc 2.43 to testing. Do not move packages linked > against 2.43 to extra or core until glibc itself moves around > Thursday/Friday. > Otherwise the package will probably break. >=20 > Best regards, > Frederik Hi Frederik I wonder if the compile error below might be related to this update since it seems to have just started happening. May not be related of course. Either way, it would be great if someone can suggest a fix for this build error? test machine is updated using testing repos.=C2=A0i.e. binutils 2.46-1 gcc 15.2.1+r604+g0b99615a8aef-1 glibc 2.43+r5+g856c426a7534-1 python 3.14.2-2 Building libcamera gets macro conflicts between the definitions from glibc vs python. This could be happening because libcamera compiles with -std=3Dc++17. What I see is that: =C2=A0 /usr/include/features.h =C2=A0 =C2=A0(glibc) vs =C2=A0 /usr/include/python3.14/pyconfig.h (python) and features.h defines =C2=A0_POSIX_C_SOURCE values of=C2=A0 - 200809L varies depending on _XOPEN_SOURCE - 202405L if _GNU_SOURCE is set On other hand, pyconfig.h fixes the value to 2008: /* Define to activate features from IEEE Stds 1003.1-2008 */ #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L which "suggests" that this is the value libcamera should also use maybe? Building libcamera started having these errors (similar ones for _XOPEN_SOURCE as well): =20 /usr/include/python3.14/pyconfig.h:2007:9: error: =E2=80=98_POSIX_C_SOURCE= =E2=80=99 redefined [-Werror] 2007 | #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L /usr/include/features.h:319:10: note: this is the location of the previous definition 319 | # define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 202405L Happens with both the current version (0.7.0) as well as git head of libcamera. thank you for any guidance gene --=-vOHGQ1qDCUVyEkyE2SNO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYJAB0WIQRByXNdQO2KDRJ2iXo5BdB0L6Ze2wUCaYsy+AAKCRA5BdB0L6Ze 2+yTAP9ZFD27B4VsgwOENM56FMDIzra3Du+UEtGP14yteSJQpgEAukV/ObsBMto5 HTHxwBMT+YmJtBgtLL2qATSovuyPOAc= =FTiC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vOHGQ1qDCUVyEkyE2SNO-- From - Tue Feb 10 14:56:41 2026 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Return-Path: Received: from witcher.mxrouting.net by witcher.mxrouting.net with LMTP id WEHPFKY6i2k6jhwAYBR5ng (envelope-from ); Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:03:18 +0000 Return-path: Envelope-to: pfeifferj@archlinux.ch Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:03:18 +0000 Received: from lists.archlinux.org ([95.217.236.249]) by witcher.mxrouting.net with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1vpoKh-00000007wYa-2P8f for pfeifferj@archlinux.ch; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:03:18 +0000 Received: from [95.217.236.249] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.archlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C970062E0AAA; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:03