Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18 0/5] 6.18.5-rc1 review
From: Ron Economos <[email-masked]>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 22:45:14 -0800
List-Id: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On 1/9/26 03:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.18.5 release.
> There are 5 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jan 2026 11:19:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.18.5-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.18.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <[email-masked]>

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 06:51:38 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768027884; cv=none; b=df+SzD54hBIfVBpoPnBN3A6dqo8ZJ9Yn386Ug5X7iff6VWdt2z/a1soYzeKhZYC6NMLST51hwc95q/yoyNkb7ZB/B3infPU0+jX7J6G1NvNMUiTP+LnWLYGl00MEeLDjhN6GlmtoS9C7oG6p/mLzft+KGixofmgPhyncGjEUP20=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768027884; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=NjmfylT7yD2RTspLXyVOBxg2uYBn3gwL3dRX+4V/k7I=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:
	 In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=KgA8ZCM6I9mWKn2+MoekPxeGpHA52NDdCZ82ApN06pIsLdh5fIUUgPCinGeEK8DnVVnxw9QD27UBXNXUutfZmuXOnf1/OD8vp9H5O5sokbR2Y2r+eSTGQC/RrVNv2V/6ktkQ4i/bDWCD86DeX+cwDmzmwtfhhzeqFfN0KSsN5U0=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=w6rz.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=w6rz.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=w6rz.net header.i=@w6rz.net header.b=woTHFbgq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=35.89.44.37
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 22:51:14 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/16] 6.12.65-rc1 review
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked]
From: Ron Economos <[email-masked]>
DKIMCheck: Server failed DKIM test, 50 Spam score
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: w6rz.net]
  1.5 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                             mail domains are different
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.105.105.114 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
  0.1 DKIM_INVALID           DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
SpamTally: Final spam score: 57

On 1/9/26 03:43, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.65 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jan 2026 11:19:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.65-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <[email-masked]>

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 06:55:24 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768028119; cv=none; b=KLshahVwBtYv1d287WnVAmy+F7uJ/bh5m9f/jRe2Cc2LVE914qlT8fosFp8eex7+NbmQxwn6cAg/HcGlcm7djUqjWpHO8QlNmU9otT8ljdvY4xQ+d+3BLCVmRKpWjVBs9Te/kCvxuBn2oWF6ZMfsT8ri0rILmeWGpj66QeuLEOc=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768028119; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=kmMbNJeGfqf4pqg+LDS4j427jcIK6sh8JtGbR6ADf+E=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:Cc:References:Subject:From:
	 In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=kseURx0Nt7aPhNQMdjLcYHJLaQoQ6cH8eXBJqYnC/s/8GPAkyk6CRxVFi/6PCB4dXsfqJea8/qgDdG2t1SbGECLfWMSMARdYpnK71ZFK4Szf3a7SAYA4cOq94o5PxTmQQUyeYfB+i5KKOWX0J1cXzTS+87KJhfBSFnYN+WgI/8Q=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=web.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=web.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=web.de header.i=[email-masked] header.b=ll2TKMNM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.72.192.78
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 07:55:14 +0100
To: Haoxiang Li <[email-masked]>, [email-masked],
 [email-masked], Don Brace <[email-masked]>,
 James Bottomley <[email-masked]>,
 "Martin K. Petersen" <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], LKML <[email-masked]>,
 [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hpsa: fix a memory leak in hpsa_find_cfgtables()
From: Markus Elfring <[email-masked]>
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:/HSmV9HNyXw=;Fs04tmG4DPBbUE+wfDpjrfpID44
 kCI2gnP0rAYenp5q8E+J78IjzkidnRL/iWV6LjcxnRi/xD23HPror5xF0maxpRK82oPUQnHqQ
 Ugp2YARzn+Uwsc2IF7J6kEkuL12TpxdGAJg+2SwNCcjCuYO9hjaI5XhB8cDn7oQv9RLJVdnXx
 zhxtKmdU+T0WppwTiET/qfIYHslZWcEwQqECtiHeQFz4WcgCFT+xU8X3nQb4M8UCRnpQPO6k4
 zgyToWxq5XUs0kHSHmeNUKkXRXjk5MGgBzvOmBxGQYejjifHcjSEIUcu7xEkHPoDCLcSnuEkw
 qx8652y+aB1MVozlgWRwChczKIMu07Pe3l0q6KEOesMuI63M9fKoaXDvJeGUzrK9RheXv6jZI
 WjGeyP5zvmKEjqdTMUdkU8loXNKdCHYSnCnV1KGP+Q8RqUJoG6t8cYy+ChQLRIUyhbk1lYYsk
 XfsRnTBD68Kc90UhSjb6PBz7tId9X8K14HiYbJJmc9wp0Qoqm59ostuO7nNiteQkicYyMP9Hk
 +pQlM/1fOBoWvHAlBJRbIjU8M+m/o7mtRiG1AG5PA1xm0IPnMNh4slEPCgqWaEZNrnS2z5k0U
 LNIeMBpT+zceYzAdkyaD12xkuODYlLtDUsR5yVCyuT6P0vcY6+qfYVR5XEfWafZYYwqRBSZTY
 L5ynpsu9u78n7cEX3mtlenypGaCI/3aPEJmQTP7un4VraLfa49r20h83qrGkxKdP4dNTJhZ/w
 sS6ERC3VaVkwa9lo+EXIPVfTpo6pu1l7h3IukX+u4BCP5i9N78fNKnba9c0vzNZ4DWH8qX3Wk
 MtGjXu62Tzwx1Q6HNjJh5Tp26tGA1QM/c0ADgvQQD6+hO94GQ+pakSDer1+Gt3CuS5cLW4ick
 9sJ3RM2DLJAEVTvhLKod6x0zhqqi3xNRuEj6p2XbHgBAMa8UsI4dzguNxfM9uTrjknIiF80Nt
 k2Z8yl/zsKofU1TGlW2SViL0e5ThuY/PHgtRz6F35noyFPFWTHW2LeTn/AhOJ7msS2eTXwlYK
 za4FjMP6AK1gwYEPuIE9zn3rWQi+rDO/o70GvJJ2Yd1ywjMJgW6atwiH5NvWNdm9yBx4Tk5g2
 i5K+0YTYbilpqg9MCFAiBkh6wvv01LH1SSQibNzTY8UBUuGl05iDQa3hMVPXVJ515LvyGE3rn
 dlk8JY0gSNHLv6LYeKSOtlmrGzMeO1iQfBcq84UNOOAOQwUnpOcO6eclg5s2JrlcDyX3qpX+w
 aHA/9zKrkWH3Sz3yshMhPYVFcLM49aNpWTOsRRDwFGMAeKl30lkBcvHnAvk+cKrOiEYHGQW3f
 J9ueiBvamFo+LdQoppiEoJ/f/Sphs9Z/nueXCIOS6ntaOGnyksxxrpQV2F6yQs7i0R3oOH2yz
 A/hiiw/vWzg6G4r8gq/zgHEJ0jg+7banQgR5cXtF42IJ8KrUWpXRl4FitUnO734vB46owoJ7D
 DcGpsj3VvAg5UOKyuB4ocCriBJht5+ap0SThYZTIhQ+wFrYmEi8BAj1SB4dPoYF+/ClV0dQjt
 HW5uIDND/Gmxq6+9/LbJ1eHpmH3NwXJYZ9oQJh4Ag/tEcwCzYv6J3owDG/xu4HW2W6132lgrw
 TKn0tBWEWTOAswcoJJE5R+HI0WOZWXCjo7kfxH/CSKNhVtUXWsLtLy+vPSMSofu5RsjHFvUXQ
 /xxmR+zURf2qGjNjHDBZcVRDHtHWKfBD7Nyaqj+i98XnJTfDfutjxkXEBCscpJP77JsZUkzpL
 FayMtde1wLf+JpvFKAunNaiF7L0KM9RN8QB5TePeGdSXT5gLTv4HClQSSL5ZlPmFS9TUfLX4E
 WU7SLOWMMv9Z+cUdUBT6HNaxRQL+rJvEBM/OfD1Ks+jZ6RvNshr2KqX8Y7Ektg26neHFhFOrZ
 f9fcUaGekCfPpmSp6aRBqbYAi3nu09jPwjpPZEI4UUHh/V6gmSmxzrGPLM0mHKrQaym4WF4Ep
 JOWSF8fAqGtpPQBzlO5kZKYcPcEweFQWQu85s8YWpnUWJkOAgvUeGXGvAM2IIRHZat4Ffmp0T
 taMABi+N2QSqbUvNlfG+BpWT30Z9/2yBLjUrpvb9Vpr09Dvrsz7bw+uYLwTSjMDZCTxPiI9I1
 hLdeCSq7DjRmNk1BzVqDuv1nA15ULkPrkWUOa2ETT3T+Hso4Qhlwg+KDQ8Ictcf8P1gd6i+83
 h99NaJCZxh3+c/aZ9KpGwTT/DkeZ+wQMnVD7n1R4rE4WGxAErJg/ZNDk6z8E97pMvrLXpQYcc
 UoDixFtloY0iVgN1Thmz5mT5tnA0wvdNmifGhnGFj8qYO94EUDvZiaenI/dlB5q1KfPSy8iz8
 yfqseR0WL19R8CKU8PkqSzMhQ0AJVQAa1NeA2OggdSm3qNWkhtZ8q1lBZHfr7bsh+i/cM5HUR
 axTYlMmPyhnGyxnZggq6CM7DVwuy7IN160hFoFld9NVRqydwAhMkGtc3GTWuvS6/nXdwICqvG
 vnW0VDiMI/qpvLF+bSJgcGQOrlcoiwxjL5KSlfmPUUt6q90UbfXsSJ3/jqE4lIFZXghzhnvLD
 cI7ZWY+NGRPIAT18LMFN2kxq7Qk8rGh0qRsxWeJilChAVWPfnP7zE6ONyy+kq8o8KSp+98esE
 Gd9d14a3knMQbiuIscvDVqTyOKcw5kgNP3sMFfE+o0gO8260a5lUTfJ7cmewfa3hvpZXcB/37
 3RIt4tRsap18XIyGequ/afjTbEehE+z4G0V93KVudBguOaZ9PJlrpjyQyGMdcjm+6+umJ7dwp
 uN1EQFulN4AxDPSwl8ix+HfkkdskbvRLzlo2tj1I8eH8PFf5XaBXsKuOHjqBALc+n2LhGnYcu
 BE/6ry4yzC06KYw1FX4qwHyXzWPIJPOJ8Xv7vliHRyGEspJrJQV6P8/rKrXIfDUwQ3WAvOS9c
 e6TRhuZa7b0Z6eWfqeJiFSW2rijnZdHYQqRsnLRFB26AhYFij2YMhf1FJg3LqmV2wF2ChR1ZG
 YsbR6IZopa2NkzBisbMqqSerMPUjkk3+BJ3po4bQcvhB7aXiXDrgX9XF4H1K4YLUIInP10QCd
 0udgVU/zv9YG/3MzoxYj872BI9w3he72XzSzU7u7TKb/QiqBZiodbiNL1CWYCMNu4G/Fc2n5m
 H9YfS3XfQLoVvls9AT6Is6gue/0oA43g4tp/jqr2BN5lR2mDm5xuW+QYPE+1KaGrelPqTk50e
 MRozoffs7Pkd0kr1pdXvX8GsQeHS9U1LusnMg4ldodBFUVnMt3spHt+PQyrc3XTB4YpakRySq
 73hGQtXF8YRwlREnKX8uTEHS3eSkesV93iP1gpMmM4jlGiFH9Zqn2RlczJVQnG15flLJWa/LA
 XVaGrs4Ebo7FlNirJUo7sshOAv5ZQ3HhzXAptXQabzsoz3f3k3WZab/Zi0VKNOUxLox3p4z9w
 JLa/AUkRyBcKROAD1SUijrlS8UO+MFkiZMGQ5yvmvsontsu9Qf9xwvKPYmc5/uKIKZFUmI14e
 R5i2dwFVmMIm3deTwUrIhXlybaUiAE7pWr2jKKfOx1DLaFVIr2rknCAVW4Lw1etcIc3S+oy1y
 5/H0e+dOip5A5TOZGcZVPVhZiZ/ZcgksRsjrlvUtUkNMDCLpUx/1SRp+J6ecjcierJQoiviNr
 obeK2+zpQYOHMRO/6RoRTsEPpW+HxfQ3WNEjCqJIJxeHqqEEA4awdnnIfuVBQ5q25P8kK0/4w
 C6fANKv1k61uZIZ+V4eqeX/QdNy87DyxC/o5XSLmKX/HejxgOnSsjvtbsO0KodFPKdzoeIy+F
 RKKcMBx5Q4QiLeOVCvAQt9wSyLuMQFLLjG4RaJjNKKHmepMH0ERuvYTPrS7/1kcLhMzATMVFw
 qVuXz+JjMZ6MRlS5OPx26UuWkr3ymO4SaEAY+q57XtnXErFCLrl9YSuyHdNzSxPTUiC7OWgjv
 ciaApiTTK9jFxlG+ynFr5xu50sOdTMthDVOdRPKB7xl9hQxdSLUXQH3wTMEeSpJqugHQnIQlG
 nuUy4GWUcymXhlC0N7Towt9lqlarQC16wtyLDIgUx8NKy6i+VO3XOmv8hghlFqiwxN/diBNEn
 bN4BrSadNeeRp0/THhQPqEBRikqkWIlOfO/o/ElvRw4h5VDUqklQ8ePgc6ZY0tKZCcrh1Pf1Z
 DbFA99NqQ5BIP9G7uNiH3XUo6yuLGlSv5uQaX5qWXm1IwaflnG0TtD5YsH7wvhc71mKnolxH1
 0uOpL3lgEof7oarjhackDigEpDeXM/sRQuEnN+I9BNVNhn+G6ygZma8wzw4Bb/dEYxKdEMRMU
 TFZIUstO4os4ZJ+qSW10KYnAIXZnxK/6ITfQF1wRM7PSjrBtRjeJpAAKYWpPkmiyC2WEEK5YC
 U/KdGuZYkrPEvLfnVdewMwHR4SHcCEDG53IOZ7txAATrPGMRijKoG7NfgkV4FGR9fVyGIFq0q
 yXDiYDimVUyy+yGUcUlZV/1is5rsGGPrfm44FN1h1irXPOc4oiRRx/yVO4hKBMLDFnFKXvsuW
 r5fUwFiWEQSjWBpt2KLwx2nNc1ZDce0k4h6LOdnG0ebJrWP4kc/M42Yo7+8djScX1JSC/yt+E
 Gp1rzMHMd3g1QqFBWv4H3BNmmfR8tr9f+sBPD72Csck/wAGM3XG/mqWGKZjdW3CqMCIrDHi+h
 trwtIBOpx3UDJY6AIf4jYMT0Jcgat27XEcBpF1bIPFpZkrOSB23HXfJSsftaTIQxt80/r5V6s
 xk7cv4E2KaPy2SJ7K6OvWWcRiUyWcdpMWvxFf9uN8UONCw69fpbk1PXjp9zL9sH62wL6GKvdI
 /7RQvkZNtpuOFdMC8lkXcr8A3D+7jxphsL7E1D9RvU8+KSsnyI1IaBwTsw52KFanFJFnEjxiL
 AjEgTmLRkU1PyYO34Lnt0BqN126WKMkWFo5MfX6OR8ePwsTbVi0SkH4bqKlwF5/Jtfvf6h88z
 DE08aykmDOjOo3YnA1Tk7nL5XChh13LBapCc/wyp+9t+A9TyeYE8bPv/97UV7RpuTCKwT3PV1
 WMGxGhiyz0zc2EUQPCt2+LRM6TrVioKEraB/xvqSj/fbxaT2TcZz925GC1Yy22O7U80h/t50Z
 GXzkn8d/ERQeOnzXrhfBaAXm63qpaVmGc4AzWOq2hBOxrsb5xyJvENtdYuas3JCOV1sr8/h4j
 SLCcg2tDTxDyFYSI8=
DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, 0 Spam score
                             mail domains are different
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
                             provider
                             [markus.elfring[at]web.de]
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.234.253.10 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
                             EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are
                             different
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
SpamTally: Final spam score: 4

> If write_driver_ver_to_cfgtable() fails, add iounmap() to
> release the memory allocated by remap_pci_mem().

How do you think about to avoid a bit of duplicate source code here?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?h=v6.19-rc4#n526

See also once more:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.19-rc4#n659

> Found by manual static code review.

Can such information indicate a contradiction?

Regards,
Markus

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 07:05:21 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768028383; cv=none; b=q2b5Pn/FlY6OXItOETA0mdd4nXTTE0vgfvo+exIJ7gOACvduKZVyENuxLLQZpv6AinTB9SK0fi/N7dWQcTPrNfnh3fJjiKzb8Olb+bP2v8IrzeiJa0sJ0xzzSWdhvimq4LUs/EIrc3M1hrWi4vKJ7ox3OdRGOKon8FKJEACLBE0=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768028383; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=/shlJGYEA0xYOZ1tFtpmb/V7ZYXkfb3Z3cAlF9aBWJ0=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:
	 In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=kQh8VUvDXNBgj4AghTaZ194LBzZ1i1YOmeLuRrv8OhvwjVc1sA3m7N7cEcpfuEtygmQ4dm8izO+981G9BxR122MKO60LohcQ8Io8FSmlz8XubUmJ737A9TSSXc/8dRxLR0jjoolC4o1b/cagsfScA1CknmCHEof6Mq6oITqCDUI=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=w6rz.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=w6rz.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=w6rz.net header.i=@w6rz.net header.b=XecAkxsT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=44.202.169.35
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 22:59:33 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/737] 6.6.120-rc1 review
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked]
From: Ron Economos <[email-masked]>
DKIMCheck: Server failed DKIM test, 50 Spam score
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: w6rz.net]
  2.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                             bl.spamcop.net
               [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?44.202.169.35>]
  1.5 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                             mail domains are different
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.234.253.10 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
  0.1 DKIM_INVALID           DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
SpamTally: Final spam score: 77

On 1/9/26 03:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.120 release.
> There are 737 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jan 2026 11:19:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.120-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <[email-masked]>

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 07:06:33 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768028791; cv=none; b=nPIDriN8GxPdtO1LR5/HqLOEj1UjJnFIdmf9SXvV5B2bjHpipgE79aGUiiPxnM8mKsaZTw27beyKCH/U4Lzfxg75bvzi9iGOk+tIRXzZ/iiQkDUHrwvKlydYjgyqtPuvsovE3U9MseGLxi6AVojrwzSzMoOpu70f+a2SuedxWrM=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768028791; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=Bvpi+RTreBdT7DbBofmlO+Agks4IgU91Dqqjeqr6ySc=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:
	 In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=pp30Rra6Zbvvt00GszlVIFVCCE8DPBTjcBuwgGCS14lj3E3NAb7YVVHjApCej2zk9NFzUM+ESoZdR1gchXSQuRAsQS0TomkuZDibzbXd6GjetCsCsSDSzb3lJPFmsEeKGGoisRb1EShUvVonEvLF/kcDC9TT49K6MhFWcyVmHc0=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=w6rz.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=w6rz.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=w6rz.net header.i=@w6rz.net header.b=AfW9NIwy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=35.89.44.39
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 23:06:27 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/634] 6.1.160-rc1 review
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked]
From: Ron Economos <[email-masked]>
DKIMCheck: Server failed DKIM test, 50 Spam score
                             mail domains are different
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.234.253.10 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
  0.1 DKIM_INVALID           DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
SpamTally: Final spam score: 57

On 1/9/26 03:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.160 release.
> There are 634 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 11 Jan 2026 11:19:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.160-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).

Tested-by: Ron Economos <[email-masked]>

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 07:17:43 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768029456; cv=none; b=Bko+6kvozlmNPV8K2tkqq2DqgzFHTc38noxsGcoZt0Gel5oevuHQYhTiztstWJhuDSbg8XPw5d1brMfgawd/U7iKQxkmsWYP/lX4geXn2/Cx4k8sSTYq/9I7pN7kVOt7EsHTNGFByw03WBF6xsOpQKLAKMBvqsbWYvUzLwWoKzo=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768029456; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=ZRbLxZqJzAxtg/FPbWfw5gS95DSw9Y7wa5SX+g9CA0w=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:
	 In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=tLcFVX5IPMs1suy5mR+oJYN810Xx2Tk7XKNLX55W5wpqrO6ZrcM+b3v69gtNJKzvpU3MjTmIgaAefljkfbGzDYZ8qUg0IyrXANw3XhZ26fhGKWqlvoE0PSSOUenmbiOR5QeBpyVIFN39J2OgcwCcQQiCL1sYB6/VIrr9LzLirp0=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=googlemail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=googlemail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com header.i=@googlemail.com header.b=D5NTsYR3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.45
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:17:32 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/634] 6.1.160-rc1 review
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked]
From: Peter Schneider <[email-masked]>
DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, 0 Spam score
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: googlemail.com]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [104.64.211.4 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  1.5 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                             mail domains are different
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
                             provider
                             [pschneider1968[at]googlemail.com]
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
                             EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are
                             different
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
SpamTally: Final spam score: 4

Am 09.01.2026 um 12:34 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.160 release.
> There are 634 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg oddities or regressions found.

Tested-by: Peter Schneider <[email-masked]>

Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider

-- 
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you.                    -- David McCullough Jr.

OpenPGP:  0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=[email-masked]
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=[email-masked]

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 07:20:52 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768029647; cv=none; b=mA/l1SCCZROPQhl4NBsk6pRR8AkClgY3X0nagFoCm7yYN0aqSTdc/4/QQcK0urobbnWFvfGb1adbJH0Yisz73OoY9oi7XVg0AqePtz23XnJ46uk0cBysI0tdKML/UmdBSkMsIunhu1NcUoFMszRXtfNeB6SYq/cj9dfMqt3iMSQ=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768029647; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=u93xdEl/geOXvRqFzG0XF76EuEnfsitrG7DmzWEsw1g=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:
	 In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=dJ9i9xaFRoEOpw+p/JHNBH/RFoxIYpyOAukfO9QVnuKCw+oG5vWPu7E3dDHlJSlbVE4zV+F0gptbDzHki78PNiNWqNQ8CLGYOFc90fGYltLswxAWbTa/V5DSavqxeD195tJdC77f/uo7od1Bud4TJcff194pInXh8RC/rQqvlkE=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=web.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=web.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=web.de header.i=[email-masked] header.b=NbXy+FWm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.72.192.78
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:20:27 +0100
Subject: Re: [v2] drm/amdkfd: fix a memory leak in device_queue_manager_init()
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Felix_K=C3=BChling?= <[email-masked]>,
 Haoxiang Li <[email-masked]>, [email-masked],
 [email-masked], Alex Deucher <[email-masked]>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= <[email-masked]>,
 David Airlie <[email-masked]>, Oak Zeng <[email-masked]>,
 Simona Vetter <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], LKML <[email-masked]>
From: Markus Elfring <[email-masked]>
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:ozbFW73gydo=;1PopX7eR9mKy7S/a/g7TfsNQCGF
 4LZckj1El1/ntbq6GlSUru4+ta7F0CgEjgA8ahX0aaka0CV2D62r5FdGzDuEy9aIaQu4Tm+Cv
 /UP+zpwnulEeh/QpwdaQdoaWU+aSPPGfk+rPyMHwVYgX3WHr/qpukSS7S1ibkclGPjbziXbsQ
 DW+EaWYifkXIhbPjRzxqqs25E1+nOHFY501krnBgqKm1szUt4uFAeQc0CI+VRMrhuXmGUNJfD
 8RuO8ne44w11sFlxfrTxP42wsDQt5epoiGvgrrDw9WxirJi3kOb7SPK+bNUfflQtrOEXkBrOy
 vb1DZbc/WyJN2QRmPFkvHBD/LytNuFPAwl3NAxgC5HpGZoYtapuAiuW463aInxkn8UDbWS0BT
 77dbrXKtM2NLGdlYQIzskcfm+8hu/HZNfTQE2CDJB325MUaQVfkdHfWVnPm+4csLdWjuhFNkC
 rlLwkp9UYgnvwzJQXDVpXBlTcGW9UhxUxhbZXI2vw60a4ORQfNfzESWH2sW/KGMYukqk0Ks4u
 MJ8ozoEGJFiJG1UiJRqD54NNwLOt/buWwwKl/EzZ6nOUyDCRlAV0vxsN3MZKU3++BWtiXXeZJ
 hQytjkhRHlFMf+y3ntVEb/8rzJ+6J5GD0m1R27d6P8VtjQpCFJCptW9nFW3CGFhd0HyH1cBK9
 nbb5z7HXPhjxa3P30inhms7HRPfdNGYKIp+bFui1AWqSSOWoyH3LXrARbUSjw6RHQTSWziNDD
 +fCgHXnCuqOqtyBixDr0U9O+nKNcF2QLOuLp7BD2cZfW3KtWKlXVIkwglZI5W3vZOn75cXhNi
 FMOgGr3C18LpbrNW8sG+Nl56InESRMNzn3/oPieouBzCt+fxeI/lJkfhv3dmonYJL02tFK5el
 ENNvXCLIAyGd7PcPGN3EqLdXQZQcVrHu7AB3oLyD1e2QEOh/Yrut1EFzMcbAS4BCHQjW7DNPc
 sl0SZlPlMGu7gT/Ayn+mE1+o7ffAAzZHPv5omx/puXhAWRAmNBnsUu6nYt5n9dJmQGevEloHg
 rXdZRO2FRRjeS+V2znjml6Pq4FaTOU98SoExPNjWnvql9AjV4q6v//RuTEgZXUP0lJdHdEkLp
 OqnFQCJCZXj5e7QyAxYD14nKd65jPJ0E8mdvRc3ePRBH9i8sbCeh6vKyZEhs8N0smekBLwBjA
 pT9cdJ8sIA7JTessf99yX9hY5q9/fQzkJLa5KUyx5rse3d2C/egNL6A2RFfiLxL+plARXB9EA
 e63GZJule1UfFSivrBBLMozV5dWHjyai7q7Lfdc1VdJmIgBrJUdh8n2NetlBchuTRpCl0QfFH
 2ZbGTBXJ7SH9B3b9CIxsJuTNpm0jQRi32LxDyIP1zBOiJTPPHg9Fd+JZ53UOzd7nb0RENt3XG
 eT5snSUGkMAneGoqYGUFUKiqvcm2itkfwId7kMfzEJpThs91vQT7cGRGv5cUg4b2WmJmvulz2
 0YjrdzbaUW6uaVohOj1HEaWy93GbMmLJhH8StjuBNUOmahW1XIEwLEb6wWd11Pxranjp91Res
 Q+vgsEocrA827iE4YB24akhVie1jLaHdhzZWR8brTy+U7bvKWPnWy+Wn5aQCqe947m0/IRgC4
 XJ7O1hySyC8ScHlc3Y+B6PEq3T924GtduvS2p0nFllzHWuCtHHeYOEO9P2rwVpmVX6b6PwFrQ
 +3foRkyJDmWpPXp1Cip1YqMWHZ+vQSnIXvyZTTIO7TtvOvf/oJaJmKSZu0bCZ9iSkKOkdj9MG
 eD7xiKVzcZ740VVMI8NA7GjfYDneoAxUxR2dAOglkDGiDqveW2c1ZSthG+pj9wDEkA/5flHgk
 YXbU7ThT19p2s5DWh/vSUrvQEvCDZ9Sq9fnLeEGYg+LUaVSJVrNWG+vzyvD6nZHiv5Su0WUgt
 n6NIocw4L94YTl6w20CXLVjEEDCebIYY5ZAoC13ROGUdZWnEWIwrfZDwvnpCVZzWpNdUSEJZW
 p9v7YtRlbCtWRdRxmBaSBso9AcEvmNk2R5R89nscKGzdaYSD0bjggF1JaTrsdqTdqeL/1FQOl
 F44pMvFzGLaXLbYoQRvcIqBBZtRcReEmvVw8hXqumXJ8zgdhbpq71r9fmf7lXLxHiYcJf+/Iw
 1zQEWSjgU5USP4Eez5+frVypuqHn1PKGqQIS20twof1WAdwV5KoKrchhBL092hsTb8Auto4LF
 Yj3QvouvrFOK5pn0YZOuR6wT3wKnJHSg34R1g7ckOd/Zoi1VfVHJGH7t7usu2dUzRXrV4wCMU
 iw3RW/jUNuimK0McNVW8/lVMLlOxWvq5y8xlATsHcZFWiAV2hxmKGyqQ+6vZ7k6ege2HHOr+o
 wYaOaSFfV+p1S7bleA/aKqxS0jaBvlsGWIzUs8sfmxIhfB+xursQGRNurG3CBFlbwRipf5tK8
 Ky0lzCJF7mb4L5fxLt/uaQoUaw+pZWEhlu+jWdD9eFNr/RSRZxnHnp5ro57Fx6bG+GOqZhkSh
 JnlQkMMk3QiiDq7E/n6QrSdBuMhUMlrKXJ9Vhhdthrf97WgKm4AsQCAGvXPbl8Pc5WLfdvx10
 dQitR/QP+lESl6oX/OGFFg7oh3yar9bbkaDtoQk7RT+GnFCMmBRVeRPSIzhDQOaYqIsRTSFFL
 x6b0kQX4rEOOHkBIjxiY1kjluptVcSgIdyvWoStKB3ZTTnihsktk8TGawx/1ZOMwZt3RWkaKr
 RiA/jngRmqBLKKh/dp/3Lfai7qQJL5vzsLamXTaSWpx/+Duvl9JcD4KEnv/50s5U0Kai+IDaX
 9dJJQIUMm4gOSFAKvZOL6wGAlsGVzGMurh3+i3C5oQLdHSoEtiKD/pUEYrPVrC2p6/mq4CVT5
 0lI+iKXLbQkaquRI8svb0W91jglpUq5CvibNc4SPksGJqX9AzjMipNstPmTGjMzWgV5LdJmYa
 hfAWhVIprWRvyaylrvy17IAa9CujoQKUOKjoIn6+TkZhFCjjjoXgqK1NAwhwnPXAgcDxzSVLm
 opA7CzUU6OjwL+yQzNtv5xhUUZgoEMCej9Eq27Li64FrTAxs2b+Rzn7H4yCNnSb/3rcUVlU5H
 pQiX7dkk5YBOM5tPRWydGx/64AT3NJvabCGmqb22y+7GznOmezzqcHF59zUvfVu5nwFO6rbgB
 Tv52FwY29djl6tNJBOQ0lz5bH2tzN/gEwJfu7TWVFBzn2ENHn3PVXmOwOHiExIj1E9vItqWXP
 bTcsVOfLs3rTTuOtiK10d+PkcTkga8O6WMKFXGK6d9zK/9U7saavC11R6H+BVBZB1o8as9fW8
 nh29wVQXnIr8TyF254F8PTYaP7UTErzUIser5E9QconmTqbQmldI83sfuzTTUzsUVW3WjAZTS
 YtnpIROdlKSjniKRGtlwGSc+ZZsh72sYq5GIQLwiF/r1pEETncVAIR9tSehgwdS25ZqqiL99m
 t76U9UuH4hRQlvU88tsfM/dOtR6Lb2YAW0F+WRHYaM8s1ncsqk8hY0AZRKF7wngRgn3wF3jmY
 5xT5jaayWxF+QWEXVtJBhpWmVgPX1gVoBS9tYntFk5mYzdsXM+edILrZBn6828FU4aldCRPwd
 8sKgDOVixu3/Aww4qFmN6ZT9NC5gweKUboIwwcujnW3vXXMDPTDQsZq1kSc1/naUAlphhQ0JW
 6eoz5pP1jJNdopjhIawQvAcoOTcThglhsiYoqtDfgYU1p/0liDSBYxo5dInhPfRYvlLPS5/T+
 YFLYuV8xi3QIc9CTXhLHOTKkStqN+UESY5ezcIpB7R7eWyhPYdij9IOgFcUNGSREPpzoonZMe
 ztWPI+W3Y6fwShsgzJ5cYBaA0pxVer0i63hQIIsD9y79XQ4kJDivsQ9WkmeiXoLXajhZHaYFn
 viXQVOOfLXqjrM/4un8uubTNKBA8znSNbt3V+/LbSeodzhPCmOca+UzlnollGae8CWGioQXSd
 z3Gcd/VeV8pCoWmB+wAVujqo6HNW2FkSxd3U2wXg7XEMvxZNTDyyzwALvgigU+N3S6DODdNmV
 KgpJI2dppX35zeNvyz4nZwzyfSwEUcDNYJXiq6U08V9R1MpW1TcRanFkwjAP2meCmGi0y4a5y
 QSurHBUn5plaVa5YbnbAboNzbpcdfVidig3zwsftV2FEg6NG5sP/J0bkKN0BwaPCbG+5DhhBd
 b6S44A6AuMfmAPis5iLHXHykbl/a5gDrIHL2ASVS7SGOlEStpaNVxej4DXEjO3wZf7KLQe7J3
 jKnj3BHdeUTB3bP0nlFkP4fBiC5PA7oobzjUxVDEjthUlXFn0kQFwplgYbHniGVCzCaz9cu1d
 tlgrLdHEHxFpwBSHnxVQczzXPuKIlpRDdWigbpsZZVD3U13HXRoyYb7SoDLb24MKlBaRbb643
 JlrU+IdyFuonOsJGAdsfObHadOLQowC2FlM0qBQYxU7DmPez50dsuZrwMNiVtEyFt+KCSKqIq
 OoBydaua/3nSSVRg3LRLaQnW2HBBCFV9UDBVocbbTISOaTwznSXjqZsUYpdpPrz6cXmHKebZV
 6zbACI3u/u/2X3VRzP/5aYejPF3YYLZxW1ITlvFVLT7fjZ3usIrkC3fD3dYOWrnuEKPOTYn6E
 uP5XdG73O+cTFZuOL/q+cCajPjus68OX9RkDMAMIz6gkS0oV15opK7KfeP401gBDNDJEVLQ7B
 IOFlo+w6H4XigPxbp/WkeESEuc/OnwKq5uc9GvGhfkZ0BBRLF6RI3ywkokVlnfLduww78z3G8
 B8kq+HRImafryRICzYUxKkX1LIVBqM2OkRxZuPNJqNDrGHVXN34bZdgJqrMcz/qEJO8ZrMlt1
 k1mgN3Wp2nfRZTUiaYdGtIMxZRTcE8m5q/7jzugd+M5Qst9wvkgGZjw2451hkip/EAwA25CAE
 PMtX+AcIKdwMya8+Sr+5NgEQwkpK/t/l+SFlNBNakWe5qdwuqGPM2shB3MiXBa7f32ElTpFht
 Umqo7ZSzZCIS58dsOT+vnIA02ShweqDwMh+gBF7e/x+ZPRJzcgl9YoFtd8F4WaWqF7TnIn/ld
 0KfVb3E2jrQVkURlau4LNpuXj54xghRU0uQshhKrlVxLFbKxa2jR7M3wNPjhKh+Jhgb59gZNr
 aVdaKBeZul0QRoyidnAIK114A2LOrQrc14QEEQ9xtHC07lbWon1ZtHCi+PbX3K4ZhKQ+cwhvb
 NPNQnl6GpS5XddpOoVJ1j1wD8JiEbmG+6zo6ruIbR1DW6clNieoUsxNpl0leJRNArLPkHMqyd
 G3m89WjI=
DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, 0 Spam score
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: cmu.edu]
  1.5 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                             mail domains are different
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.232.135.74 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
                             provider
                             [markus.elfring[at]web.de]
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
                             EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are
                             different
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
SpamTally: Final spam score: 4

>>> But=C2=A0it's=C2=A0also=C2=A0harmless.
>> How=C2=A0do=C2=A0you=C2=A0think=C2=A0about=C2=A0to=C2=A0avoid=C2=A0spec=
ial=C2=A0development=C2=A0concerns=C2=A0here?
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree=
/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?h=3Dv6.19-rc4#n1242
>=20
> No. I think the WARN is used exactly as it was meant to be here: to chec=
k=C2=A0for=C2=A0something=C2=A0that=C2=A0should=C2=A0never=C2=A0happen.

Do we stumble on another target conflict at such a source code place?

Would you like to avoid undefined behaviour here?
https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/spaces/c/pages/87152449/EXP34-C.+Do+no=
t+dereference+null+pointers

Regards,
Markus

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:24:00 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768033426; cv=none; b=Ee7ckeBRn4sNr5CS/sZqPsTokXzDQC2MktrL2kp/M5pomhweMAv2gwwUt7Uhc8+yH9fszCky+uAc09MsJGBQw6x945CCVxK92M99uH9sRhkgVc8GphGMvgUVycl816jD3CIP1kpQ/l0fTbh1XUs+26UBJRSJ+SA7F92quSObL34=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768033426; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=r2eEmiwIMswi/KIcQchbLwESKW9bSNI5Wwpf6dmjcII=;
	h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:
	 In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=GmpWxyrcsl2pGmoLP1Az2leggmR7frJnrUN15ts7zPtb5GNmSthJsvmkGVKY2YlzqDpg1IzyIMpHi8IhY9US00m9JTDotDa+GOIOYTQl/n3bU9cgYEn9VeR8Iaxif1RI2nOO6uAMDt9l7qQkBD1G/H+2/uuQuvx9tCe0qXT+oHg=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=FLU6NtvQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.170
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 15:23:36 +0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/3] virtio-net: don't schedule delayed refill
 worker
To: Jakub Kicinski <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email-masked]>,
 Jason Wang <[email-masked]>, Xuan Zhuo <[email-masked]>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Eugenio_P=C3=A9rez?= <[email-masked]>,
 Andrew Lunn <[email-masked]>, "David S. Miller"
 <[email-masked]>, Eric Dumazet <[email-masked]>,
 Paolo Abeni <[email-masked]>, Alexei Starovoitov <[email-masked]>,
 Daniel Borkmann <[email-masked]>,
 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email-masked]>,
 John Fastabend <[email-masked]>,
 Stanislav Fomichev <[email-masked]>, [email-masked],
 [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked]
From: Bui Quang Minh <[email-masked]>
DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, 0 Spam score
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.234.253.10 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
                             provider
                             [minhquangbui99[at]gmail.com]
  1.5 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                             mail domains are different
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
                             EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are
                             different
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
SpamTally: Final spam score: 4

On 1/10/26 09:12, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue,  6 Jan 2026 22:04:36 +0700 Bui Quang Minh wrote:
>> When we fail to refill the receive buffers, we schedule a delayed worker
>> to retry later. However, this worker creates some concurrency issues.
>> For example, when the worker runs concurrently with virtnet_xdp_set,
>> both need to temporarily disable queue's NAPI before enabling again.
>> Without proper synchronization, a deadlock can happen when
>> napi_disable() is called on an already disabled NAPI. That
>> napi_disable() call will be stuck and so will the subsequent
>> napi_enable() call.
>>
>> To simplify the logic and avoid further problems, we will instead retry
>> refilling in the next NAPI poll.
> Happy to see this go FWIW. If it causes issues we should consider
> adding some retry logic in the core (NAPI) rather than locally in
> the driver..
>
>> Fixes: 4bc12818b363 ("virtio-net: disable delayed refill when pausing rx")
>> Reported-by: Paolo Abeni <[email-masked]>
>> Closes: https://netdev-ctrl.bots.linux.dev/logs/vmksft/drv-hw-dbg/results/400961/3-xdp-py/stderr
> The Closes should probably point to Paolo's report. We'll wipe these CI
> logs sooner or later but the lore archive will stick around.

I'll fix it in the next version.

>
>> @@ -3230,9 +3230,10 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>>   
>>   	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>>   		if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>> -			/* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
>> -			if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
>> -				schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> +			/* Pre-fill rq agressively, to make sure we are ready to
>> +			 * get packets immediately.
>> +			 */
>> +			try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL);
> We should enforce _some_ minimal fill level at the time of open().
> If the ring is completely empty no traffic will ever flow, right?
> Perhaps I missed scheduling the NAPI somewhere..

The NAPI is enabled and scheduled in virtnet_napi_enable(). The code 
path is like this

virtnet_enable_queue_pair
-> virtnet_napi_enable
   -> virtnet_napi_do_enable
     -> virtqueue_napi_schedule

The same happens in __virtnet_rx_resume().

>
>>   		err = virtnet_enable_queue_pair(vi, i);
>>   		if (err < 0)
>> @@ -3472,16 +3473,15 @@ static void __virtnet_rx_resume(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>>   				struct receive_queue *rq,
>>   				bool refill)
>>   {
>> -	bool running = netif_running(vi->dev);
>> -	bool schedule_refill = false;
>> +	if (netif_running(vi->dev)) {
>> +		/* Pre-fill rq agressively, to make sure we are ready to get
>> +		 * packets immediately.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (refill)
>> +			try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
> Similar thing here? Tho not sure we can fail here..
>
>> -	if (refill && !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL))
>> -		schedule_refill = true;
>> -	if (running)
>>   		virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
>> -
>> -	if (schedule_refill)
>> -		schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> +	}
>>   }
>>   
>>   static void virtnet_rx_resume_all(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> @@ -3829,11 +3829,13 @@ static int virtnet_set_queues(struct virtnet_info *vi, u16 queue_pairs)
>>   	}
>>   succ:
>>   	vi->curr_queue_pairs = queue_pairs;
>> -	/* virtnet_open() will refill when device is going to up. */
>> -	spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> -	if (dev->flags & IFF_UP && vi->refill_enabled)
>> -		schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>> -	spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
>> +	if (dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
>> +		local_bh_disable();
>> +		for (int i = 0; i < vi->curr_queue_pairs; ++i)
>> +			virtqueue_napi_schedule(&vi->rq[i].napi, vi->rq[i].vq);
>> +
> nit: spurious new line

I'll delete it in the next version.

>
>> +		local_bh_enable();
>> +	}
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>>   }

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:32:03 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768033693; cv=none; b=WXNZBG13mLDQgm1UYxz4G2hEpMumA7b6Av/7tmEUo7szXbzQzf/uhQ0RstQhsE6iexMD2r3BliJhdSZfYFXA627drwA6aXS9uSErwkrcOQf6CCIDlR5OMGYp6tFqgtMgV3jtePXfWpvYm76TeFUamQN5kGUt953Iy6wZVWMDnPI=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768033693; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=HwLZonKz7nJ3UUbNpNFO4EoIf+B9rbQIDyoEC27m7Xk=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HQRYZ/9NsfQI/CNDQI8Gw5lRSQsk5DO3fNTQ+2rNENHuFgWUp1UxZNu2Ht+XRvRK1q+XyKcyn/bMMJN5/dCkV32lVPQYXFoeF07l6mDj/e0KQhM7asffs3F9UjDrxks91ulTERuN21tugOj2rDenwWYPGHiAzZNk4F9Dq0KXm1o=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b=UkBxrGpZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 09:27:54 +0100
From: Francesco Dolcini <[email-masked]>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/737] 6.6.120-rc1 review
DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, 0 Spam score
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: dolcini.it]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.234.253.10 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  1.5 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                             mail domains are different
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
SpamTally: Final spam score: 4

On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 12:32:19PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.120 release.
> There are 737 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Compiled and tested on

 - Verdin iMX8MM
 - Colibri iMX6
 - Apalis iMX6
 - Colibri iMX6ULL
 - Colibri iMX7

Tested-by: Francesco Dolcini <[email-masked]>

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:33:08 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768033867; cv=none; b=JV/565sGp10u4jJ5/tBJhX5teX5JafWVoyxH3ZCEdyTzKjP4tzb7u6B02y5ifd7OWB8snPSjLiC8YpsnUCEt2jZVYyH5a/4NjrodgFyMtB0L43xJf1hvuoO0EUHib57+R9sGbw2g3RRt5Qe00sgCdHJf66DAjcGaVL/+5gscY3c=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768033867; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=ZbUFGCZbuIoZAm+53fbW4AmaXwvq/GgRu1n/TCdj9uo=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=WyUuLTw59ACCMgv2VKAwDSdhhRVwSMdZ3pullQszAx8GuPifc6X/uYGEYR+e6wXqO2+rKNlS3Zi7HRGszlHNyyQmveE54kR/zt5zCR6O6U78il1+Btw59AZ/QXSoVcAvzvmLSybVlY7JNbXeaZyMd6wQApIA4Q4LqGXzk9Mde3w=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b=g0+2GuPT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 09:30:43 +0100
From: Francesco Dolcini <[email-masked]>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/16] 6.12.65-rc1 review
DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, 0 Spam score
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.234.253.10 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  1.5 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                             mail domains are different
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
SpamTally: Final spam score: 4

On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 12:43:41PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.65 release.
> There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

Compiled and tested on

 - Verdin AM62
 - Verdin iMX8MP
 - Toradex SMARC iMX8MP

Tested-by: Francesco Dolcini <[email-masked]>

Francesco

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:42:23 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768034514; cv=none; b=pa5XTOFAX5lUbeq7rBuBOgYnZHj7wsLVMhMC+59VMZF/WTeexUwIFNcNKgiXMRt1R1PAYpMvEtYfGqQwxiy0KyIbAXHKYhZF/cUHQWb6uTXPc+ZNzqgVvtv9o2u8W9kMdXzx+lkDGA62jpgM41daILddqV/jcSz2dI8PdJ9T1p4=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768034514; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=BCRNlgzCQQc1Jlrbfncr5/Zhoc8nxLGoDKgyHIkSqc4=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Yoi62w8xwy2xVu4ZsGZZqNzRc3kpkC3bhVDz7kczA4dH4TChh+aPWT6PHA3x0rhGpjcbKSkoi7hl7MIPLUCxjmkUZGaAZld64z7pGo0EJAv+WH/B/5b6TKClLPfygfVBta9a8ZQ4eQTEVIbhwVGBbZI02S4tqqFG5wFvAIiivWE=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b=EZCi0C4e; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 09:41:42 +0100
From: Francesco Dolcini <[email-masked]>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/634] 6.1.160-rc1 review
DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, 0 Spam score
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: dolcini.it]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.234.253.10 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  1.5 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                             mail domains are different
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
SpamTally: Final spam score: 4

On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 12:34:38PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.160 release.
> There are 634 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.

It seems this introduces a regression on Verdin i.MX8MP compared to 6.1.159.

[   10.209496] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff8001f537c000
[   10.217443] Mem abort info:
[   10.220242]   ESR = 0x0000000096000005
[   10.223997]   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[   10.229317]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
[   10.232376]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[   10.235522]   FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault
[   10.240404] Data abort info:
[   10.243288]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005
[   10.247127]   CM = 0, WnR = 0
[   10.250099] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000049c42000
[   10.256806] [ffff8001f537c000] pgd=100000023ffff003, p4d=100000023ffff003, pud=0000000000000000
[   10.265525] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[   10.271801] Modules linked in: 8021q garp mrp stp llc spidev caam_jr caamhash_desc caamalg_desc bluetooth crypto_engine rng_core authenc libdes ecdh_generic ecc mwifiex_sdio dwmac_imx stmmac_platform stmmac mwifiex cfg80211 imx_sdma pcs_xpcs crct10dif_ce fsl_imx8_ddr_perf etnaviv rfkill gpu_sched governor_userspace imx_bus ina2xx ti_ads1015 snvs_pwrkey industrialio_triggered_buffer lm75 rtc_ds1307 kfifo_buf rtc_snvs flexcan can_dev caam error spi_imx imx8mm_thermal pwm_imx27 imx_cpufreq_dt libcomposite fuse drm ipv6
[   10.317785] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W          6.1.160-rc1-6.8.5-devel+git.b40085af0da5 #1
[   10.328155] Hardware name: Toradex Verdin iMX8M Plus WB on Dahlia Board (DT)
[   10.335215] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[   10.342195] pc : dwmac4_dma_interrupt+0x120/0x270 [stmmac]
[   10.347750] lr : stmmac_napi_check+0x50/0x1e0 [stmmac]
[   10.352941] sp : ffff800008003e40
[   10.356262] x29: ffff800008003e40 x28: ffff80000a253f80 x27: 00000000fff0e80c
[   10.363419] x26: ffff80000a253f80 x25: ffff8000097d3c50 x24: ffff80000a5cc07d
[   10.370575] x23: 0000000000000005 x22: 0000000000000005 x21: ffff800008003ea8
[   10.377729] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffff0000c6cc0900 x18: 0000000000000000
[   10.384885] x17: ffff8001f537c000 x16: ffff800008000000 x15: 0000aaaaf065c7c0
[   10.392036] x14: 0000001a92b60e94 x13: 0000000000000128 x12: 0000000000000001
[   10.399190] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : 0000000000000000
[   10.406345] x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : ffff8001f537c000 x6 : 000000000000d041
[   10.413498] x5 : 0000000000008040 x4 : ffff8001f537c000 x3 : 0000000000000000
[   10.420653] x2 : ffff0000c6cc4540 x1 : ffff80000b330000 x0 : 0000000000000000
[   10.427811] Call trace:
[   10.430266]  dwmac4_dma_interrupt+0x120/0x270 [stmmac]
[   10.435460]  stmmac_interrupt+0xb0/0x150 [stmmac]
[   10.440218]  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x5c/0x170
[   10.444942]  handle_irq_event+0x4c/0xc0
[   10.448791]  handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa4/0x1a0
[   10.452901]  handle_irq_desc+0x40/0x60
[   10.456663]  generic_handle_domain_irq+0x1c/0x30
[   10.461295]  gic_handle_irq+0x50/0x130
[   10.465059]  call_on_irq_stack+0x30/0x48
[   10.468990]  do_interrupt_handler+0x80/0x90
[   10.473185]  el1_interrupt+0x34/0x70
[   10.476780]  el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x30
[   10.480895]  el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68
[   10.484310]  arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x30
[   10.487899]  default_idle_call+0x30/0x6c
[   10.491831]  do_idle+0x248/0x2c0
[   10.495071]  cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x40
[   10.499004]  rest_init+0xe4/0xf0
[   10.502246]  arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x18
[   10.506873]  start_kernel+0x688/0x6cc
[   10.510551]  __primary_switched+0xbc/0xc4
[   10.514576] Code: 35ffffab 321d0000 17ffffec f9800091 (c85f7c8c)
[   10.520687] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[   10.525316] Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception in interrupt
[   10.532199] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
[   10.536132] Kernel Offset: disabled
[   10.539628] CPU features: 0x000000,00800084,0000421b
[   10.544602] Memory Limit: none
[   10.547664] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception in interrupt ]---

Thanks,
Francesco

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 08:53:37 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768035215; cv=none; b=Avtq8/5dXACiJH2zwX977jKHrw5qC0+aPPpHawDA9Y+VmgmCLKDFd1DF1QLzKj4RklQKkpnchFCYpCsOpP8fIuVFQkspEvsaYeh/mvn4XP2o59vXU38ZOhEWIUWgkM1mR8LujmlLHUh8qYem4YFJHAZHvaIvKuqlCnIqJ2fG0xc=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768035215; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=TdjaLFHm+9qhYlQPmPUfWc3gNQp64UbYDkNueZon6MI=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ye2qvDA/GqQQztH1EUoD9+R7Zmt3kx3+s0xlAkdbvwhqxXWAazj2ELVckhhUTpqrF4ZzpQvRKxJMadNwpv1qX8aA/KgNclryXLKDKIK/kJvdyF7CNxjWXfWnLB3wD5/h3qYHbIi0yXQ2QWTCMBXUSe62F39lblRn4AjvjKh8hDU=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=ZTToNoSs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 09:53:28 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>
To: Francesco Dolcini <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked],
	[email-masked]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/634] 6.1.160-rc1 review
DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, 0 Spam score
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.234.253.10 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  1.5 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                             mail domains are different
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: linuxfoundation.org]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
 -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH         DKIMwl.org - High trust sender
SpamTally: Final spam score: 4

On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 09:41:42AM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 12:34:38PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.160 release.
> > There are 634 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> 
> It seems this introduces a regression on Verdin i.MX8MP compared to 6.1.159.
> 
> [   10.209496] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff8001f537c000
> [   10.217443] Mem abort info:
> [   10.220242]   ESR = 0x0000000096000005
> [   10.223997]   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> [   10.229317]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
> [   10.232376]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> [   10.235522]   FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault
> [   10.240404] Data abort info:
> [   10.243288]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005
> [   10.247127]   CM = 0, WnR = 0
> [   10.250099] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000049c42000
> [   10.256806] [ffff8001f537c000] pgd=100000023ffff003, p4d=100000023ffff003, pud=0000000000000000
> [   10.265525] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [   10.271801] Modules linked in: 8021q garp mrp stp llc spidev caam_jr caamhash_desc caamalg_desc bluetooth crypto_engine rng_core authenc libdes ecdh_generic ecc mwifiex_sdio dwmac_imx stmmac_platform stmmac mwifiex cfg80211 imx_sdma pcs_xpcs crct10dif_ce fsl_imx8_ddr_perf etnaviv rfkill gpu_sched governor_userspace imx_bus ina2xx ti_ads1015 snvs_pwrkey industrialio_triggered_buffer lm75 rtc_ds1307 kfifo_buf rtc_snvs flexcan can_dev caam error spi_imx imx8mm_thermal pwm_imx27 imx_cpufreq_dt libcomposite fuse drm ipv6
> [   10.317785] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W          6.1.160-rc1-6.8.5-devel+git.b40085af0da5 #1
> [   10.328155] Hardware name: Toradex Verdin iMX8M Plus WB on Dahlia Board (DT)
> [   10.335215] pstate: 200000c5 (nzCv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [   10.342195] pc : dwmac4_dma_interrupt+0x120/0x270 [stmmac]
> [   10.347750] lr : stmmac_napi_check+0x50/0x1e0 [stmmac]
> [   10.352941] sp : ffff800008003e40
> [   10.356262] x29: ffff800008003e40 x28: ffff80000a253f80 x27: 00000000fff0e80c
> [   10.363419] x26: ffff80000a253f80 x25: ffff8000097d3c50 x24: ffff80000a5cc07d
> [   10.370575] x23: 0000000000000005 x22: 0000000000000005 x21: ffff800008003ea8
> [   10.377729] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffff0000c6cc0900 x18: 0000000000000000
> [   10.384885] x17: ffff8001f537c000 x16: ffff800008000000 x15: 0000aaaaf065c7c0
> [   10.392036] x14: 0000001a92b60e94 x13: 0000000000000128 x12: 0000000000000001
> [   10.399190] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : 0000000000000000
> [   10.406345] x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : ffff8001f537c000 x6 : 000000000000d041
> [   10.413498] x5 : 0000000000008040 x4 : ffff8001f537c000 x3 : 0000000000000000
> [   10.420653] x2 : ffff0000c6cc4540 x1 : ffff80000b330000 x0 : 0000000000000000
> [   10.427811] Call trace:
> [   10.430266]  dwmac4_dma_interrupt+0x120/0x270 [stmmac]
> [   10.435460]  stmmac_interrupt+0xb0/0x150 [stmmac]
> [   10.440218]  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x5c/0x170
> [   10.444942]  handle_irq_event+0x4c/0xc0
> [   10.448791]  handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa4/0x1a0
> [   10.452901]  handle_irq_desc+0x40/0x60
> [   10.456663]  generic_handle_domain_irq+0x1c/0x30
> [   10.461295]  gic_handle_irq+0x50/0x130
> [   10.465059]  call_on_irq_stack+0x30/0x48
> [   10.468990]  do_interrupt_handler+0x80/0x90
> [   10.473185]  el1_interrupt+0x34/0x70
> [   10.476780]  el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x30
> [   10.480895]  el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68
> [   10.484310]  arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x30
> [   10.487899]  default_idle_call+0x30/0x6c
> [   10.491831]  do_idle+0x248/0x2c0
> [   10.495071]  cpu_startup_entry+0x34/0x40
> [   10.499004]  rest_init+0xe4/0xf0
> [   10.502246]  arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x18
> [   10.506873]  start_kernel+0x688/0x6cc
> [   10.510551]  __primary_switched+0xbc/0xc4
> [   10.514576] Code: 35ffffab 321d0000 17ffffec f9800091 (c85f7c8c)
> [   10.520687] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> [   10.525316] Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception in interrupt
> [   10.532199] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
> [   10.536132] Kernel Offset: disabled
> [   10.539628] CPU features: 0x000000,00800084,0000421b
> [   10.544602] Memory Limit: none
> [   10.547664] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception in interrupt ]---

Can you run git bisect to find the offending commit?

thanks,

greg k-h

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 09:27:54 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768037269; cv=none; b=tDTtJxgl0ZsO9xuvvTw5en/LIHS/3BT4Zd0jWkfY1b54cZ9lMHKFikBuwftwhXpHEveE2jfR13AsMaV9VSKnuldOVGgZWUMf2tpkyXU006mA3h3NVA8A4T81mLiBJ7a3bCx7bDdnR8JR0wFovkk9ZTVmNKcXg5+L/Jp0YifrEMs=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768037269; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=yKJK540WKXUYrH2xFj9ONvRfRhRouLl6J+zWW8nid7E=;
	h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ip5pXcnIjNxigmTnlB5qoCnsj6kT7rZkN1UCsiT9bYSKIotmevbOTxsR++/f66HR50xibdfTdc8Riht4/lmGgzVvf3NlbJUUxFr8jIyw3dkvm/Xb448IQ1TEiyeTvGNwleSBkCrVU7RvIxZIN0YS/L4qs9tRxIiI4/h4+Eib9Mg=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZWUdgOv9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 10:27:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <[email-masked]>
To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?G=FCnther_Noack?= <[email-masked]>
cc: Benjamin Tissoires <[email-masked]>, [email-masked], 
    [email-masked], [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: magicmouse: Do not crash on missing msc->input
DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, 0 Spam score
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             envelope-from domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.232.135.74 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
 -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH         DKIMwl.org - High trust sender
SpamTally: Final spam score: -11

On Fri, 9 Jan 2026, G=FCnther Noack wrote:

> Fake USB devices can send their own report descriptors for which the
> input_mapping() hook does not get called.  In this case, msc->input stays=
 N=3D
> ULL,
> leading to a crash at a later time.
>=20
> Detect this condition in the input_configured() hook and reject the devic=
e.
>=20
> This is not supposed to happen with actual magic mouse devices, but can b=
e
> provoked by imposing as a magic mouse USB device.

Applied to hid.git#for-6.19/upstream-fixes, thanks Guenther.

--=20
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 09:29:11 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768037341; cv=none; b=s4zvSZSNXPLSDQndFu3zDV0KyAyScc0Ke5H9xJsswldAB0pgleF1RF8I9jJCTjZb4N00UZ9CyOeFGm2sQyxIkRw/vbk9KWbTt3EPwm6VMsDG0vjsewxGK0LpvXYu45xC8ep0gsd657j3gu5rRWuoH/177xDZY1bwhf345a08C4w=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768037341; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=svoVtkKrNDwM1MXKQRKoi5fzU1RqRRU3wRu1ssEaU9w=;
	h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qv8l1zLteTxa4qKprW9/yi4hj0uoTNnGEoMSnOVgGsIDtQDRQ8jcbJF3Vxapgz++dFQ9iQhu8nrn7wdvU66/fuVAo/NgAIAGCEjCEW/Oqk8sHfp0zPrAHljbLEL7TqpXGu9VJWwQTTqfHDLEeFEruxG0+LqbbZw68m4V1eOoIrQ=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VmiIlk2o; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 10:28:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <[email-masked]>
To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?G=FCnther_Noack?= <[email-masked]>
cc: Benjamin Tissoires <[email-masked]>, [email-masked], 
    [email-masked], [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: prodikeys: Check presence of pm->input_ep82
DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, 0 Spam score
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.234.253.10 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             envelope-from domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
 -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH         DKIMwl.org - High trust sender
SpamTally: Final spam score: -11

On Fri, 9 Jan 2026, G=FCnther Noack wrote:

> Fake USB devices can send their own report descriptors for which the=20
> input_mapping() hook does not get called.  In this case, pm->input_ep82=
=20
> sta=3D ys NULL, which leads to a crash later.
>=20
> This does not happen with the real device, but can be provoked by=20
> imposing =3D as one.

Applied. thanks.

--=20
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 09:30:01 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768037392; cv=none; b=S4UVt/ZhB7q3kktpV2jF3Z74d1yzkMEpMBlTWNWJKev9mjEqwp8XyoK6Zl9qeE2dbO9FMru9mUw7r4LLa1abqyZ00bFxwdASJwnWkbPkBqtin81dLmB5+WPBpYlLBKbhmpkcVRDdaUOIphr9FkCkZlzl6veQ2gAxC2x0LHIt/Es=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768037392; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=g7SmOxfJrNFQceWB56Z6Gom7c2UYoMc+bb8kGjS4MO4=;
	h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=i9v3yH3ScNtyrq4ATEHmyFp3emqMLrXhiKc+tInneKmoogoWaqM3QXWsXJ85c/EAxHgddGylo2sHpCahx/NKHDxKvSIZHuEs+T8a7BwurvWIxOhlmx2jIUGWZuZM4/+exFJVnw084k+eKTxoMypVDV9L6FZBksuAHrVVi3VG+aA=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hM+ItYlz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 10:29:49 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <[email-masked]>
To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?G=FCnther_Noack?= <[email-masked]>
cc: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Filipe_La=EDns?= <[email-masked]>, 
    Bastien Nocera <[email-masked]>, 
    Benjamin Tissoires <[email-masked]>, 
    Greg KH <[email-masked]>, [email-masked], 
    [email-masked], [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] HID: logitech-hidpp: Check maxfield in
 hidpp_get_report_length()
DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, 0 Spam score
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.234.253.10 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             envelope-from domain
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
 -0.0 DKIMWL_WL_HIGH         DKIMwl.org - High trust sender
SpamTally: Final spam score: -11

On Fri, 9 Jan 2026, G=FCnther Noack wrote:

> Do not crash when a report has no fields.
>=20
> Fake USB gadgets can send their own HID report descriptors and can define=
 r=3D
> eport
> structures without valid fields.  This can be used to crash the kernel ov=
er=3D
>  USB.

Applied, thanks.

--=20
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

From - Sat Jan 10 10:02:35 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 09:54:06 +0000
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1768038843; cv=none; b=e6yQKLqNBJMkHYGHtF4++a6RzeM8sxJWBQAsPvjbyu2GK0Qv9wxiKvFBlnN5+HwxcXAzqNU2zr8GmetDgGOQwosifocVOD9pJIMFU5e++Wp/1wcWwlv2U/FQIdeOV918/NKjkqZCqXIt2aXfSg8JhT5YIZ1Oa9ZoM1vguURN0P0=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1768038843; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=yL+5nDlRuP0DDKJR6kMiVZMt2mnQsVcin+5neQ6LxoQ=;
	h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:
	 To:Cc:Content-Type; b=CfRf1P4QVKgNyClvrP7CJ3RGYGK9TtUGEEIB5nVcXh/AEaCBScrsJZK3llqKEfy/16q7DOFazfikPfVSErg4PTpg+ckw4BgCaq2Hbhj53/gj45RkEV7OuR11Oio4anajl07AfEnjZogew3ZKvWLe30PX2lwy1CuEyD14g8sKRq8=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rajagiritech.edu.in; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rajagiritech.edu.in; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rajagiritech-edu-in.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rajagiritech-edu-in.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=dizv/ttv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.51
From: Jeffrin Thalakkottoor <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 15:23:24 +0530
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18 0/5] 6.18.5-rc1 review
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked], 
	[email-masked], [email-masked], 
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], 
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], 
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], 
	[email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], [email-masked], 
	[email-masked], [email-masked]
DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, 0 Spam score
                             mail domains are different
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
                             DNSWL was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#DnsBlocklists-dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [172.234.253.10 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI     Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list
                             manager
SpamTally: Final spam score: 5

hello

Compiled and booted  6.18.5-rc1+

No  typical new regressions   from dmesg.

As per dmidecode command.
Version: AMD Ryzen 3 3250U with Radeon Graphics

Processor Information
        Socket Designation: FP5
        Type: Central Processor
        Family: Zen
        Manufacturer: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
        ID: 81 0F 81 00 FF FB 8B 17
        Signature: Family 23, Model 24, Stepping 1

Tested-by: Jeffrin Jose T <[email-masked]>

--
software engineer
rajagiri school of engineering and technology

From - Sat Jan 10 10:05:13 2026
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jan 2026 10:05:09 +0000